Links Portal

https://justpaste.it/88rh8

Saturday, 7 March 2020

HOW TO HAVE A HAPPY DEATH by F. M. Lee, C.SS.R.


Your Death

Don't turn the page.

Don't run away because of those two words up there. You are only running into its arms. We all are. There was one man who stayed and looked at death, listened to all it had to say, and, for the rest of his life, he never feared it again. Would you like that? Never to fear death again? Well, here is the way it happened for him.

Once upon a time, there was a beautiful queen. Her name was Isabella, and she was ever surrounded by brave, adoring courtiers. Beloved above all to this Queen was a handsome, young nobleman, whose name was Borgia. Francis Borgia. He loved his queen purely and deeply. He had laid his sword at her feet, and he hoped for long and happy years of honour and high position at her brilliant court.

But the queen died, as queens will, and she died very young, as some queens won't. The sad and broken Francis Borgia accompanied her funeral cortege in the long journey across the hot Spanish countryside to the city of Granada. Finally, they arrived at the palace, and a ponderous, legal-looking individual came out and declared that the casket must be opened to make sure it was really the queen inside.

Now, this was all before the days of our modern, clever embalming. And so, when the casket was opened, there was simply sheer horror. The stench, the pockmarked, decaying face, the sight of the milling vermin, struck the young courtiers like a nauseating flood. They groaned, they fled.

All except one. Francis Borgia stayed. There were sudden tears in his eyes, but they were not for the queen. They were the kind of tears that St. Paul must have shed as he rode out to persecute the Christians, and being suddenly struck from his horse by the Almighty, lay, crying there in the dust, a blinded man. But now, Francis is speaking to his queen for the last time.

'Oh Lady, you can take every hope that I ever had for honour and glory and put it beside you in that casket. I see now how death hovers like a shadow over all earthly beauty, mocking it, waiting to turn it into dust again. Farewell, my poor queen, I go to serve a Master Who can never die!’

And he went out to become one of the greatest Saints that God ever had. All because he had the courage to stand and look death full in the face. Let us.
After all, you know that the trees are already growing on the hillside, the trees that will someday cradle you against eternity. That not too pleasant picture - your own coffin. And yet, your pall-bearers are alive today, my friend. The machinery to carry you out of the land of the living is already in motion. Your own heartbeat of this very moment promises you there must be a last heartbeat some day. It cannot just go on. Your dear heart is your guarantee of death.

Shall we grow military for a moment, and plan our little campaign with death? Not against death, for we can never be victors there. We shall die. The curse of death is on us, and even the Son of God felt that curse of death on His cross. But plan our campaign we will, and the first line across our blueprint is bold and definite. It is this. 

Death will come.

Look at your watch for one minute. Do it. During that minute, about two thousand people died. At each second, another one stood before his God to hear the eternal decision, the final judgment on his life. All day, all night, they suddenly appear before Him, like endless millions of leaves, slipping quietly to the ground in the autumn of the year.

Up the polished marble steps goes Death, past the armed guards goes Death, to lay its cold irrevocable hand upon the most important shoulder in the world. And never has it been known to ask, 'How ready, how rich, how old are you?’
We find ourselves uncomfortably remembering the beautiful, glossy-leafed, fig tree that our Lord one morning cursed until it shriveled before the eyes of the apostles. Uncomfortable, not because He cursed it, but because He cursed it for its barrenness, whereas no fig- tree in all Palestine was bearing fruit just then. It was not the season for fruit. Why curse a tree for barrenness in the early spring, when it was supposed to be barren? Why, except to warn us, who put off our complete conversion to God until the autumn of our lives, until we think it is time to turn to God. And find that our shriveled souls, cursed for unproductiveness, cannot turn in their clay sockets.

So we shall die. And the thought of it strikes us with the force of a feather landing on a pink cloud.

We have seen an hourglass. The glass with just enough opening for a grain of sand to pass through at its waspwaist. The bottom and top are closed off, and exactly enough sand is put into the top as will take an hour to pass through the opening. When the hour is over, all the sand is on the bottom. It is no accident. That is all the sand there was.
And down a highway in Queensland, at seventy and eighty miles an hour, two automobiles are recklessly closing up the distance between each other. Four young people in each car, four young drunk people, and the sands of their lives are running out fast. Their clothes and their consciences are badly dishevelled, and in three minutes they will stand before their Creator and give an account of their lives. Meanwhile, we shall be using acetylene torches to separate their poor bodies from the tangle of steel and glass. Death must have seemed so far away as they began that ride. The papers called it an accident. There was no accident. That was all the life they had been given, and it ran out.

If we could only get that picture clearly. The hourglass of our own lives. What is left in the top? How much? Three hours? The papers may call it an accident, but that was all the life that you had. Perhaps you will never get to a confessional again. Never to be absolved again. A blood clot, a stroke, a speeding car- God will get to you no matter where you are. Neither He nor you will add a grain of life. It was all settled before you were born, and it has been running through all these years. Have you an hour left? 

How many people live in mortal sin?

No longer are we drawing bold lines in our blueprint for the campaign with death. Very shaky lines, for death has all the advantage here. It can strike from behind. Forty thousand people will die tomorrow morning, and twenty-five thousand will not even see death coming. They will be as young as you, younger; as healthy as you, healthier; richer, poorer than you, and suddenly their brain will be paralyzed in death and they will be dragged before the judgment seat of God to answer for it all. What if you are standing there with them? You could be, you know.
They are sitting in their homes tonight, quite alive. By two oclock tomorrow afternoon, their bodies will be waiting for identification at some morgue or other. Tonight, they expect death exactly as much as you do. Death is for hospitals and battlefields, and for the old.

Christ died for us, loves us, and yet, because He must judge us, He was almost pleading when He said, 'I will come to you like a thief in the night. As though: 'If there is anyone you don't want Me to find you with, if there is any place, any home, any car wherein you don't want me to discover you, stay out of it! I promise you that I shall come as a thief! No sound, unexpected, unseen. When do you least expect me, married man, when do you least want me? Single man? Woman? I have warned you. Don't gamble that I lie!

If Adam and Eve had not committed their sin, we would not be thinking of death this way. There would be no death to think of. God never meant our souls and bodies to be torn apart in a last agony. Soul and body were meant to be one, as they are in you today. And so we are terrified at the thought of this unnatural separation. No friends return to tell us about another life, all is surrounded with mystery, darkness, fear.
And yet, our own personal, eventual heaven or hell is not a thing suddenly thrust upon us the day we die. There is really no mystery about it at all. If a man keeps crying out to God throughout his life, 'I will not have you, then his fate will have the simplicity of an echo on the day he dies. God crying back, 'And I will not have you! Nobody builds for hell and lives in heaven; no one builds for heaven and finds himself in hell. On the very promise of the Almighty: 'Man shall go into the house of his eternity. Just as you build it today. So the sinner arranges two hells for himself. One on this earth, a mental hell, where he lives without peace of mind; one in eternity, where he lives without peace of mind or body. A two-time loser.

A priest raced through Melbourne in his car, pulled up at a hospital, and rushed for the bedside of his dying uncle. He was carrying the Blessed Sacrament, the holy oils. He came into a little vestibule, next to his uncle's room, and then, strangely enough, sat there for five hours until the man died. You see, his uncle had been living with a divorced woman for twelve years, and the woman was in the sickroom, and violently refused to let the priest enter. Long ago, that man had made his choice, and on this day, he would have to stay with it. The priest had brought his God as far as God would go, and now He waited, ten feet away. Waited for the man to die.
There is a line in the Scriptures, 'I swear, as I am your God, I am not mocked.
There is a line in the Scriptures, 'It is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God!

We watch human life, and it becomes a grim thought that these human beings shall die as they have lived. The thought can take practically all the comfort out of lying in bed on a Sunday morning, instead of going to Mass. And the bed can seem like a veritable nest of spikes when we realize the compounded guilt of keeping the children away from the altar, away from the railing. The brooding fear of what it might be like this Sunday morning, to fall into the hands of the living God, maliciously defied, deliberately angered.

And what of the person who has surrendered to some secret sin? He has made a contract with impurity, and death may break into the contract at any minute. All the while, his hope for heaven is just a mockery, a vague waiting for a vague someone who will decide for him whether he wants heaven or hell. In the heart of every sin there is a dark core of unhappiness and its name is death. The soul, dead in sin, and the body ever in jeopardy what if death had been waiting there, what if the last grain of sand had run out, and he had died as he was living?

These are the houses we build, and God has promised us that man shall go into the house of his eternity. As he built it. And the poor soul, who lives down all the years of her life with a concealed sin on her soul. (If only she knew the sheer happiness, the sense of humility, the desire to help ever so kindly, that wells up in the heart of any priest to whom she says, there in the confessional, 'Father, I held something back years ago. Please help me.) Carrying the dead lumber in her heart, knowing only unhappy years now, and an eternity of payment when death shall find her out. Go, dear soul, go to any priest. By the grace of God, go today!
And sometimes, in the abandon of his reaping, death strikes at those who choose to ignore the responsibility that God has woven into the act of human love. They choose to ignore the child, choose an engineered sterility, or when mechanisms fail, choose murder.


The lady stopped the missionary after the last Mass. He had never seen anyone so broken, so despairing, so fearful.
'Oh, Father, what shall I do? My husband and I have prevented children these twenty years. This morning, Father, he was dead. Beside me. Dead. Oh, what can we do?’
Would it have done her and her husband any good to have looked upon the decaying face of Isabella, the queen? I doubt it. They would have simply come to know what death looked like. The courtiers, who fled from the casket of their queen, knew what death looked like. They knew, and they tore it out of their memories as they stumbled back to a life of pleasure. Knowing is not enough, so God said, 'Remember, remember thy last end, and then, thou shalt never sin. That is why you find a skull, a death's head, somewhere in the portrait of the old saints. They were always remembering what death could do to them. They could not stop its invasion of their body, but their whole life was geared to make sure that death would never touch their soul.
Human love is blind. (In much the same order, so is chemical attraction.) One man had about five minutes to live, and the priest begged him to renounce the unlawful wife who stood at his death-bed. But the gentleman rose up in his bed to cry out, 'I'll not tell her to go, I'll tell her that I love her and will love her in hell. And the life blood came pouring out of his mouth. Dead.
In hell he would love her! In hell he would hate and curse her for all eternity as the cause of his own endless agony. There is no love in hell. The peace of mind that you have never known in your bad marriage will not be waiting for you in hell. Aren't you human enough to want happiness and peace somewhere along the line? Dreamer, you haven't it today, and you have made sure you will never have it throughout the eternities.

But perhaps you have grown used to sin. Are you glad, at last? You may find another nugget of comfort in knowing that, quite often, a bad conscience does not trouble folks, even on their deathbed. You can kill off your conscience. One man did, and as he was dying, Cardinal Bellarmine leaned over him to suggest an act of contrition. The man looked up at him.

'Father, what is contrition? He had five minutes in which to tell God that he was sorry for a lifetime of sin, and he did not even remember what sorrow meant.
As a missionary, one often enough meets people who are quite pleasant and blithe about living in sin. It is the nearest, known thing to the peace and beauty of a sepulchre. Christ acidly called it, 'clean without, whitewashed, and the corruption of bones within. One, the prince of the fallen angels, hopes they stay pleasant and blithe. He will never bother them, even on a deathbed. Why should he? They are in his pocket, and there is no struggle. Why take the case to court and argue further? He has the deed, signed, sealed, and delivered. Don't envy them.
For, there is a sentence in Holy Scripture that holds what is about the most dangerous, final, shocking truth that has to do with us creatures of God. It is this: 'Seek the Lord, while He may yet be found. While He may yet be found. So there can come a day when He can't be found. So there are people walking about the streets of our cities, and they are already condemned to hell. They will step from this life into hell forever. Their last chance, their last grace, was turned down, and God will never bother them again. There is a peaceful death for you.

Because you have cared enough to follow these thoughts upon your death, this reading can be all the grace you will ever need. It may be your last, but it is enough, if it will lead you quickly to the confessional, or at least, for this moment, to kneel and make a fervent act of contrition. Start the road back . . . . . . Do that, remembering that on one of these todays, you will look for the first time into the eyes of Jesus Christ.
Bravely look now, and say your act of sorrow deeply, lovingly, to Him. Mercy is marvellous.

Perhaps, on the other hand, you are the one who has made plans for your deathbed. You will come back then. You will give up sin only when you no longer have the strength to commit it. You will snap your fingers, and God will come running. And the poor fool of a God, who demands that we intend to give up sin, will listen anxiously while you admit your transgressions, while you throw him the dregs of your life, and the sop of amendment forced on you by physical sickness.

Have you ever been really ill? So in pain that you cried to die? There lies such a one now, and his mind is growing dim. The pain quiets a bit, and a new anguish arises as he wonders who will take care of his broken wife and children. He wants to rise and protect them, but the sickness has taken the last ounce of his strength. He has never tried to conquer his flesh, and now he has fallen again and again. He is half crazed at the thought of the eternal hell before him. The terrible thing called despair is rising in the depths of his being. He is sick, heart-broken, his will weakened, and now- suddenly he is going to rise up and make a good confession of his whole life, his every bad action all those years; his strength will miraculously return, his mind will clear. . . . It won't. He spent a lifetime putting a different kind of machinery into motion, and now it moves heartlessly on to his destruction.

Mercy is marvellous, and he made a mockery of it, and his fate already lies across the Scriptures, 'I swear, as I am your God, I am not mocked! And this is mockery.
Oh, your priest will run to the bedside with everything the Church has. And your priest will come home to sit in his room, and stare awhile at the wall, and wonder- what kind of sorrow was that- what kind of amendment was that what kind of consciousness was that?

A few days later, the priest will bury that man in consecrated ground, and perhaps wonder where God has really buried his soul.
Too cruel? Oh no. St. Jerome is there to remind us that in all the Scriptures, only one man ever came back to God at the end of his life- the good thief. Just one. One, so we would not despair. But only one, lest we are thinking of trying it ourselves.
But ask the One, Who hung next to the good thief, and poured out His mercy that afternoon.
'Yes, the good thief. He came up out of a childhood of poverty and fear, he came to Me out of his years of ignorance and oppression. He came to Me at the end of the chase. I gave him one chance, and he took it.
'And you? So many years, so many chances, so much mercy.
All the Christian world turns to its God on the cross. Look up confidently, for This is the One Who forgave His murderers. All of us.

 Time Is for Eternity
THE YOUNG virgins have formed a group, now, in the Roman arena. Except for their clothing, they are very much like the senior high school girls, who are shining up that graduation ring every conscious and every unconscious moment, with happy eyes set on the great day in June. But there are no rings, and there will not be any great day in June for the young virgins here in the arena. They were quietly living along their Christian lives, when suddenly time ran out. Time for living their Christian faith ran out. Now they have to die for it. Their faith is no different than the faith of the young high school girls in your parish, but now these young Roman girls must die for it.
Thousands of eyes will watch them die. The people are already there, sitting forward rather eagerly, actually human beings, who have come out to see other, cornered human beings.

And the animals, the other animals, the ones they keep in the cages around the arena enclosure, are watching, too. Starved for two weeks now, but soon they can sink their jaws into this delicate, living human flesh, and the little girls will be quite defenceless against the tearing, drooling jaws. God help them quickly be unconscious.
Of course, they do not have to die. If they just take a bit of incense, and burn it before that marble god, and deny the name of the Jesus who died fifteen years ago over in Jerusalem, they will be as free as birds.

Rosalia is among the virgins. Rosalia, so made for youth and life and love. Maybe God will have some strong Roman soldier die for her. Or, maybe it is lawful to burn a little incense, because her father just did. Her father has gone over to the pagans. And see, the young girl on the edge of the group, she is leaving them, she is accepting the incense . . . she is burning it before the god of marble. Surely, now. Surely, now, it is all right to go along and burn a little incense. Except . . . that this is HER eternal happiness waiting out there on the arena sands, and there never can be anyone to walk out there and bring it back to her. Eternal happiness is out THERE, Rosalia, so walk out . . . look up at your Christ . . . He knows the fears, the human tears walking, walking. ., youth and life and love are sweet, Rosalia, but just keep walking . . . Oh, Christ, take her quickly. Eternal youth, eternal life, eternal love.

And so..We get to try it again.
Or did we try it at all last year? What was it? Incense before which gods? Time ran out on that one Friday, time for just passively being a Catholic ran out, and you had to take a stand on denying yourself meat at that banquet. You ate the meat, you, the strong man, and the little girls in the Roman arena turned themselves into torn, bloody meat for Christ. We, the living, get to try it again. We get a new year, in which to live our faith. The little girls had to die for it. It is the same faith. We are the underlings.
Eastman, the creator of the Kodak empire, sat in his penthouse, atop the Chicago skyscraper. His left hand rested on a series of buttons, electrical buzzers that could demand and produce from the outside world anything and everything to delight the heart of man. But Eastman's left hand was very cold, and Eastman was very dead, and Eastman's right hand held all the story, his own revolver. Before he took his life, he wrote a little note, a curt little autobiography, a piteous paraphrasing of something Christ had said. The note ran: 'I have had everything that life has to offer. Life has no more to offer, so I want no more life.

Christ had said, 'For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?
In the twilight of the Old Year, we think of trying it again. And we gaze up from this reading to find Christ there, in the shadows. Christ with His scales, to weigh the conduct of our life against His indestructible words, 'What doth it profit? Wherein is the profit, to lie awake at night, hoping not to die before dawn, to die in one's sins? Wherein is the profit to have throttled off conscience, so that, in a blind bravado, we do not care if we die before the dawn? How went the exchange, when we traded out our peace of mind? How went the bargain, when we traded out our soul? Who, then, owns that soul tonight? And would that one take its place in hell? Who would? Who can?
If only you could really die away into nothingness. Then, it might be a trifling thing to hide behind the veils of marriage and turn love into a deliberately unfruitful lust. If only the children did not have to go on forever, if only they were not immortal, then it might be a trifling thing for triflers to deny them the poor, short span of human life. If only it were a trifling thing to walk today without peace of mind, and to lie down tonight, condemned forever. If only you did not have to go on forever. If you did not have to be alive somewhere a million years from tonight, and still go on paying, paying, paying. . . . .
 For a sin that could have been forgiven in two minutes in the quiet of a confessional and a burst of burning sorrow. Here, in the last shadows of the Old Year's twilight, let me study my profit.

So many things seem profitable, so many promise happiness. Throughout the day, we seem to drive on from one little gain to another. A bit more comfort realized. A taste sated, a thirst. Some work passed off to another. A compliment attained and laved in. A thousand little creature things, burning up our time and talent and energy, promising us happiness. Taking up all our day, and all our days, until they have all our life, and yet none of them seems to mention any happiness for the day after we die. They never talk about that. Only God can. Only God can dare mention the day after we die. Only God can talk about the sheer profit of eternal happiness. All the way back to the catechism, then. Know Me, love Me, and serve Me, and I shall so drown you in love and happiness for all eternity that you shall forget the tiny inch of time, the tiny inch of suffering on earth, when you won these endless centuries of bliss.
Here in the quiet, before the world gets at me again, and fools me again, let me plan my happiness. I was born to be happy, and only sin can make me sad. Only sin is sad. Sin is the only sorrow, because it, alone, cannot be turned into joy. Poverty and sickness and heartbreak and bereavement and loneliness are sorrows, but they all can be turned into joy. For Christ and Mary were all those things, poor and lonely, heart-broken and bereaved, and I, so poor and sick and ungifted upon the human scene, can have the quiet happiness of Christ and Mary, if only I do not tear God and His peace out of my heart.

But how about the time to come? Will I still feel this way? Will I still be working at this kind of happiness? I work all year so I can take two weeks off for vacation, and now I am asking myself if I will work at my faith a couple more years so I can take eternity off.

Another thing that worries me. Everybody in hell wanted to go to heaven. Nobody wants to go to hell. Just what happened? Maybe they thought that some priest or nun or mother or angel was standing behind them, and would take care of all that for them. Nobody is worrying about me tonight. Nobody . . . Nobody. And the people in hell wanted to go to heaven just as I do. They just didn't do anything about it. They wanted something else more than heaven, and it turned out to be hell.

The train was an hour out of Melbourne. The litter, human and otherwise, of long travel, lay strewn about the lounge car. We had formed a little tete-a-tete group in one corner of the car. To while away the time, we agreed that each should suggest what he thought the best mental attitude for the next twenty-four hours, if we knew that an atom bomb would destroy us all at the end of that time. Our discussion never got beyond the young man who led off. With a self-assured, sophisticated smile, he flattened us all by this solution:
'I'll worry about tomorrow when it comes.’
At first blush, and last blush, a quite insane answer. Here, we had agreed that we were all to be bombed out of existence the next day, and still, our young hold-out planned to play in the clay of this world till it blew up in his face.
But are we less foolish? Who promised that poor sensual side of us even twenty-four hours, and yet, perhaps we still put off the conquering of temptations till some tomorrow. When will we face the fact that heaven is not a gift, but a reward for DOING something? God had to test us some way, and He decided to leave it up to our body, as to whether the soul would go to hell or not. Cry as we will about being weak, that will not change the facts. There is a test going on. We all want to go to heaven, but we will end up wherever the body drags us to, the heights of heaven, or the rocks of hell.

And who promised that selfish side of us twenty-four hours in which to grow unselfish? Nobody will ever need a prayer more than the selfish. Nobody. Their design for living is 'me first.' The grammar is bad, but the tragedy is fatally worse. Their Poisonous attitude reaches out into every action, every decision. Always planning ahead to have everything come out their way. Always wringing out the last drop of satisfaction from every situation. Their lives are a living denial of, a perpetual challenge to the most basic platform of Christ's doctrine, Christ's blueprint for ever getting to heaven, namely, taking up the cross and denying oneself. How well and how long such a one had better sit in the Old Year twilight, and swear to himself that he shall become selfish for his soul, even as he had been selfish for his body, for his will, for his way. It is a task for giants, or for a weakling with God at his arm.
Of course, there is no tomorrow. There is just a series of todays. On one of those todays, you die.

It is late now. The new day will soon break from out the shadows. The young virgins, the millionaire Eastman, the lad on the train, have all told their stories. And someday your story will be told. In a few years, death will have claimed most of us who read these lines, and people will begin to forget how we looked, how we talked, how we laughed. The inevitable wall will rise up between the living and the dead, between the living and you, the dead. Your wife, your husband, your children must begin calculating how to live without you. They loved you, indeed, but you are out of their plans now. The story never changes. Your own last will, the laws of your state, will take away every penny you had. And you worked all your life for that. Just what did you save for yourself? For YOU?

When it is all over, and the seasons have laughed and wept and sported about the fields above your grave for many a year, what if someone could come upon that last cradle of your body, find that casket, and reach in to take up the handful of dust that was you? Will you care? Will you laugh, as you look over God's shoulder, and then be swept away into the delightful social calendar of the courts of heaven? Will you care about dust when you have God? Or shall it be a cruelly valuable handful of dust? And will you look up a moment from the infinite torture of hell, to know that a flurry of wind has just caught up and spun to the four corners of the earth the priceless handful of dust, once your body? Gone, into nothingness, and you must go on, paying for that, for all eternity. How was the gain? How the profit?

Oh man, look long into the twilight shadows, until you see gazing back at you the burnt, shocked, hopeless eyes of someone who once lived exactly as you are living tonight, of someone in hell, who gambled on a tomorrow, and lost. Ask him what he would give for five minutes back on earth. Ask him what he would do. You have the five minutes. Remember, you could have spent them on your knees. You could have thanked God for letting you live long enough to be making the greatest act of sorrow in your life. It could mean eternal happiness, no matter what has happened in the past. Five minutes. Remember, you are responsible for them. You will know it eternally.
If, tonight, with all authority, you could find your way into hell, and tell some poor damned soul that he is to be freed in fifty years, he might well cry out: 'Fifty years! If your message is true, I don't care if it is fifty-million years. So long as this will end. Do you know the very hell of hell? It is to be without a reason for counting the days and years. There is no calendar in hell. It just goes on. But now I shall count again! Fifty years, and then eternity will be just beginning!

But no such messenger will ever find his way into hell. They can all forget how to count. No wonder that the terrible word ''eternity'' has sent legions of the most brilliant, gifted minds and personalities into monastic cells, despising as dirt whatever the world had to offer, and fearfully readying their souls and accounts for the crack of doom.
And now the New Year is trembling at the threshold. Fifty years! Will you count them as a Catholic, walking out in the New Year to your obligations, to your duties, to your prayer and kindness and love? Will you take your place with the lion-hearted young girls, those other Christians in the Roman arena, who believed as you do tonight, and went out to die for it? And at the end, eternity will just be beginning!
You have the greatest gift in the world tonight- you are alive. Perhaps you can write 'failure’ behind everything you ever tried. Perhaps you are alone in some rented room and nobody knows or cares whether you go on living or not. Maybe the Catholic solution to some problem in your single or married life seems to have beaten you down into the dust, and you crawl and choke and weep and hate the falseness of your position. Or maybe, from your sickbed, life seems a foul, obscene, pitiless joke.
But you are alive tonight, and you can still have it all! Eternal youth, eternal life, eternal love! God made you for it. Reach for it. It is all that anyone will ever need, and you can still have it all. Walk out and clasp it with fingers of steel, and never let it go!
St. Joseph, Patron of a Happy Death, Pray for us.

Nihil Obstat: V. Rev. J. CULLEN C.SS.R.,
Prov. Sup. Imprimatur: NORMAN T. GILROY, D.D., Archbishop of Sydney.

Slightly adapted for space and distributed by https://traditionalcatholicresistance.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, 11 February 2020

The War of Antichrist with the Church and Christian Civilization

The War of Anti-Christ with the Church and Christian Civilization is a book written in 1885 by an Irishman, George F. Dillon, DD. It was republished by Fr. Denis Fahey in 1950 as Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked as the Secret Power Behind Communism. The central theme of the book alleges that atheistic Illuminism, through the infrastructure of Grand Orient freemasonry, driven by the ideology of the philosophies laid the foundations for a large scale, ongoing war against Christendom in general and Catholic Church in particular. The document claims that this had been manifested primarily through manipulating the outbreak of various radical liberal republican revolutions. Particularly those focused on atheism or religious indifferentism in their anti-Catholicism. The book details revolutionary activity in France, Italy, Germany and Ireland

Included within the scope of the book is material on the Illuminati, Kabbalism, Jacobinism, the French Revolution, the Carbonari and Fenianism. The Alta Vendita document was given wider exposure in the Anglosphere after being first translated for the book and placed within a historical context. The book was influential to Catholic integralism in Ireland, Britain and the United States, as well as national conservative politics. Fahey who republished the book in the 1950s founded the Maria Duce political movement to fight for an Ireland under the social and spiritual reign of Christ the King. The company who republished it, the Britons Publishing Society, described the book as "of world-wide importance".



 New World Order : 36 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out to be True The CIA administered drugs to, and practiced mind control on . Illuminati News, Illuminati Conspiracy, Old Soul, Conspiracy Theories, Freemasonry, The Secret, Mindfulness, Paranormal, World

Saturday, 1 February 2020

Kindness





Father Frederick William Faber was a beloved spiritual writer, preacher, and superior of the Oratory of St. Philip Neri in London. An Oxford scholar and Anglican priest since 1839, Faber converted to Roman Catholicism in 1845 following his mentor John Henry (later Cardinal) Newman. During the 1850s, Father Faber published several popular spiritual books, which have been treasured by Catholics ever since: All for Jesus, Growth in Holiness, The Blessed Sacrament, The Creator and the Creature, The Foot of the Cross, Spiritual Conferences, The Precious Blood, and Bethlehem. The present work, Kindness, which bears an imprimatur, is taken in part from Spiritual Conferences, which was published in 1859. (Introduction by Librivox reader = dave7)



Wednesday, 29 January 2020

Blessed are the Clean of Heart


Understood in its entirety as embracing its higher grade, that is, perpetual virginity consecrated to God, purity of heart is a gift which only Christianity can give. (Encyclical, Sacra Virginitas, Pope Pius XII, 1954) If we have been called to receive this wonderful gift, let us humbly thank God. It is a sublime dignity to belong, body and soul, to God.
Sacred Scripture says of men: “What is man that you should be mindful of him, or the son of man that you should care for him? You have made him a little less than the angels, and crowned him with glory and honour. You have given him rule over the works of your hands, putting all things under his feet.” (Ps. 8:5; Heb. 2:7) But under a certain aspect those who are living in virginity can be said to be superior to the angels. Since an angel has no body, he offers God only the homage of his spirit. A virgin, on the other hand, must bear the burden of an earthly body. He must offer continually on the altar of his heart (and often after a heroic battle) not only his soul with its appetites and will, but also all the impulses and lower faculties “which wage war against the soul.” (I Peter 2:11)

This is a double sacrifice, which St. Ambrose calls a continual martyrdom of body and soul. But the reward lies in the joy and peace which flow from this perpetual offering of soul and body to the Immaculate Lamb. This happiness is a compensation for any conflict which must be endured, and is a foretaste of the joys of Heaven.

There is a purity of heart and chastity which is an obligation for everybody, even for those who are married or preparing for marriage. Everybody is obliged to avoid any act of impurity in so far as it is opposed to his own particular state, to the natural law and to the divine law. Do not think that this degree of chastity is any easier than the first. Sometimes the obligations it imposes are even more difficult than those of absolute virginity.

There is only one remedy for impurity. It is the practice of virtue to the point of sacrifice. Only a man who is ready with the help of God to make any sacrifice can preserve purity of heart. It is a hard struggle, but only those who win can see God. Our Lord has said: “Blessed are the clean of heart, for they shall see God.” (Mt. 5:8). Only the clean of heart will be able to see and enjoy Him forever in Heaven and by means of His grace will be able to see Him in a less perfect manner on earth. St. Thomas says that mental blindness is the main effect of impurity. (Summa, II-II, q. 53, a. 6) This is because anyone who gives himself up to impurity loses all spiritual enlightenment and easily loses his faith as well. He no longer sees God, and he does not believe any more, because his heart is steeped in the mire of impurity. “The sensual man does not perceive the things that are of the Spirit of God, for it is foolishness to him and he cannot understand...” (I Cor. 2:14) He is like the blind mole which creates its own dark little underground world and cannot see the sky any more.

St. Paul warns us in the following words: “Do you not know that your members are the temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought at a great price. Glorify God and bear him in your body.” (I Cor. 6: 19-20)

We who are temples of the Holy Ghost, redeemed by the Precious Blood of Jesus, must keep unsullied the purity of our hearts, the lily of our innocence. We must do this no matter what sacrifices it may cost us. Those stern words from the Gospel, “if thy right eye is an occasion of sin to thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee,” (Mt. 5:29) refer in a special way to the obstacles we must overcome and the sacrifices we must make to preserve this beautiful virtue. There can be no half-measures. We must be prepared to go to any length, even to accept death if necessary, like St. Maria Goretti. Even as we should be ready to face martyrdom for the faith, so we must be ready to face martyrdom in order to preserve purity of soul.
by Cardinal Bacci

Thursday, 28 November 2019

The Revolution against the Father



 With thanks to Non-Possumus and a supporter of the blog for a better than google translation!

The Dominicans of Avrillé just published an excellent article about the destruction of the paternal role. It agrees much with the statement made recently by HE Williamson.  A day does not pass, not even an hour, without us witnessing a very serious and unthinkable facts against the father: delusional feminism, procedures and persecutions against the fathers of family by means of revolting wives (even among Catholics of Tradition!) etc .... These poor women do not realise that their fatherless children will be the future slaves of the republic. It is not a simple moral decadence linked to usury but the logical product of the "revolution" organized by the Lodges. To each of us to take the measure and fight against this evil machination.

 The Revolution against the Father
Source: Website of the Dominicans of Avrillé

Fifty years ago, in 1969, Dr. Pierre Simon, a French pioneer in the contraceptive pill, was elected Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of France. Ten years later, in 1979, having succeeded in legalising abortion, he explained that it was only the beginning of the Masonic plan. The next step was artificial insemination (now known as IVF: medically assisted procreation), which would eliminate the father:
With the pill, one has a normal sexual life without procreation; with artificial insemination, procreation will take place without sexual act [...]. Sexuality will be dissociated from procreation, and the procreation of paternity. It is the whole family concept that is changing over here: the father is no longer the parent, but the one who raises the child. [...] [There will be] on one side the emotional and sexual couple - the procreative woman, the nonproductive man -; on the other, the society, mediated by the doctor, which brings the demand for children closer to an availability of anonymous seed, controlled and governed by the "sperm bank" [...] [1].
At the time of writing, this shift is reaching its critical point, as the French Parliament is preparing to legalize the "IVF for all". Some children will not even have an adoptive father. What will the consequences be ?

The Janissaries Syndrome

If educators have long observed the shortcomings of children deprived of a father, Bernard Gibello found a striking type in the Janissaries of the Ottoman Empire: snatched from their parents to be forcibly conscripted into the Muslim army these unfortunates became fanatical warriors, compensating for their need for a father by unconditional submission to the Turkish tyrant. André Bergevin summarises and comments on the psychologist's analyses:
Character traits presented by children without consistent paternal education were collected by Gibello as Janissary Syndrome; indeed, these elite soldiers (often homosexuals) had their peculiarities to have been taken away from their families (Christian) and to have suffered, in a Muslim environment, a religious destabilization and especially a conditioning making them replace the image of their real father, by the abstract image of the Sultan in whose service they slavishly put their aggressiveness.
[...] Similar personalities were numerous among the Hitlerites. We can also remember that Armand Maloumian who knew the Gulag from the inside, tells that in 1948, the N.K.V.D. organized sexual orgies between deportees and those deportees hitherto rigorously separated. Pregnant women were then told that they would be released after one year to take care of their offspring. Obviously it was not, but their children were confiscated by the Soviet state who raised them in specialized schools, to make, mainly, policemen fully dedicated to the cause of their only identifiable father: the Communist state. It is instructive to see how authoritarian regimes, very varied, and at different times, have perfectly exploited the domesticated and instrumentalised aggression of children without father and without family.
Do those who now demolish paternal authority want the authoritarianism that tomorrow may need "Janissaries" to impose unpopular dictates? Is it a coincidence that (in 1997) a senior officer of the Gendarmerie, in a study meeting, spontaneously and curiously defined his new recruits as: "neither God, nor father! ". The first part of the definition is commonplace in this materialistic age, but the second can surprise those who do not know the work of Gibello. [...]
Men so need a father to honour and follow, that if he is absent or simply fading away, and if God is ambiguous, they can fall back on the image of a state authority, and to be satisfied with this substitute, that with their peers, they will blindly serve the arms in the hand. Any decline of paternalism is a chance for centralized authoritarianism, that is to say, a chance for tyranny [2].
The revolutionary logic
In the Republican values ​​of France, this scenario gives rise to curious resonances. Was it not possible to say that the Declaration of Human Rights was written for a citizen "a born child found and dying unmarried" [3]? "By cutting off the head of Louis XVI - Balzac added - the Republic cut off all fathers' heads." In 1792, Rabaut Saint-Etienne, president of the National Assembly, proclaimed that the State must "seize man from the cradle, and even before his birth, because the child who is not born belongs already to the Fatherland, "while the Revolutionary Deputy Joseph Lequinio, anxious for universal fraternity, proclaimed:" It would be happy for the human species, that all the children do not know their father [6]. "

A devilish relentlessness
After the supernatural authority of the Church, nothing can oppose the Revolution more than the natural authority of the father of a family, precisely because it is natural, that is to say, independent of the State. Like any totalitarian ideology, the Revolution cannot support an authority prior to its own. For two hundred years, under the pretext of "liberating", it has worked tirelessly to isolate individuals, depriving them of all roots, all tradition, all attachment, all human links and all natural protection against the almighty state. As early as 1793, the future editor of the Civil Code proclaimed:
The imperious voice of reason was heard. There is no more paternal power. One man cannot have direct powers over another, even his son [7].
The Civil Code of Napoleon
In this methodical destruction of the family, the responsibility of the Napoleonic Civil Code is overwhelming.  Bishop Delassus noted:
This code was made to destroy families, abolish heredity, destroy local traditions and isolate individuals, annihilate and gradually destroy all territorial and industrial influences for the benefit of anonymous and cosmopolitan capital [...]. There is no more ‘our home’, legally at least, but unstable families. The spirit and the text of the Civil Code are opposed to any consolidation, to any perpetuation. It  attaches to the family,  the idea of ​​a fleeting society which dissolves at the death of one of the contracting parties.
To support his claims, the counterrevolutionary prelate quoted Frederic Le Play lamenting "the lamentable spectacle of the perpetual liquidation forced by the forced sharing of inheritances" and he stressed that this effect was planned and explicitly desired. On June 6, 1806, Napoleon wrote to his brother Joseph, who became King of Naples:
I want to have in Paris one hundred families, all having risen up with the throne and remaining dependent on it. Those who do not go along with it will be dispersed through the effect of the Civil Code. Establish this Civil Code in Naples; all that is not attached to you will be destroyed in a few years, and what you want to preserve will be consolidated [9].
This cynical plan came from England. In the eighteenth century, Queen Anne imposed on the Catholic Irish equal and forced division of the land, reserving  to the Protestants the ability to test according to English laws; the soil of Ireland thus passed inexorably into the hands of Protestant lords.

From divorce to common law
The cynicism in the legalisation of divorce. Officially, the Law of Alfred-Isaac Naquet (1881) only covered a few extreme cases, particularly painful. But little by little, all the restrictions disappear. While this law of 1881 still prohibited, in the event of adultery, the marriage between accomplices, the prohibition is abolished in 1904; the delay before a new "marriage" is shortened in 1907 and progressively everything is done to facilitate the procedure.

Is it a drift? Obviously no, since Naquet will publish in 1908 a book very clearly entitled: Towards the free union. But it was necessary to proceed in stages. Naquet confided to his friend P. Abram:
To legitimise free unions, we need a change in our mentality. Because, basically, marriage is rather imposed by our morals than by our laws ... But one does not change the mentality of a nation by a decree or a law, especially when this mentality is, like ours, also imbued with Catholic prejudices [10].
To "deconstruct" these "prejudices", one must resort to trickery and lies. Slowly bit by bit, solemnly assuring at each step that there is no question of going to the next and marking, if necessary, a break long enough to forget the promise.

In 1884, in the Naquet law, divorce was only an exceptional remedy, sanctioning a serious fault. As early as 1886, the procedure is simplified. From 3,000 divorces in 1885 to 23,000 in 1938, 35,000 in 1950 and 110,000 in 1981. In the meantime, in 1975, divorce was legalized by mutual consent.

From contraception to abortion
The same techniques of manipulation to attack the unborn child.
In 1963, to promote contraception, the French Movement for Family Planning (MFPF) presented it as the cure for abortion, and, for the sake of the cause, warned against it:
It destroys a baby's life after it has begun. It is dangerous for your life and your health. It can make you sterile.
 Once contraception is accepted, family planning "forgets" that it was supposed to block the road to abortion, and begins to seek the legalization of it. In 1970, Dr. Elton Kessel confesses to the Congress of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) in Tokyo:
If until now abortion has not been advocated by those responsible for family planning, it is because it would have damaged the reputation of the movement. Now that ideas are evolving, Family Planning can change tactics [11].
In parallel, to move public opinion, it does not hesitate to rig the figures, multiplying by six the number of clandestine abortions, and by forty that of women who died from abortion [12].

Towards the fatherless child
The major manoeuvres for the artificial manufacture of fatherless children began in the 1990s. As soon as the IVF was obtained for infertile couples (1994), the campaign for homosexual "couples" was launched.
On 3rd November 1998, Élisabeth Guigou, Minister of Justice, defends in these terms the draft Civil Solidarity Agreement (PACS) in the National Assembly:
The opponents of PACS claim that it would be dangerous for marriage. [...] Some still add a threat: the agreement would be only a first step towards the right to filiation for homosexual couples! Those who claim it involves only themselves. [...] I say with the greatest firmness that this right should not be confused with a hypothetical right to the child. A heterosexual or homosexual couple has no right to have a child outside of natural procreation. The recent laws on medically assisted procreation [...] are not intended to allow procreation of convenience on the basis of a hypothetical right to the child.

I am aware of the possible lawsuits on a possible "follow up" of this bill that would prepare more fundamental changes to our law. This text would be "a double-edged sword ". I resist with the greatest force such suggestions.

This dishonest vocabulary, which suggests that this text would hide something else and that your reporters and the Government would be acting  fraudulently in respect to the law, is unacceptable.
Fourteen years later, the same Élisabeth Guigou explains that it was a ruse:

At the time, the important thing was to pass the PACS. There was fierce resistance to PACS in the Assembly, but also in society with demonstrations, verbal outbursts  [...] So, the important thing was to dissociate PACS from marriage, legally and symbolically. In 1998, it was not possible to put the issue of same-sex marriage on the table, even within the government, I had to insist. At the time it was something that was much less accepted in society, you will not find anyone opposed to PACS nowadays. Today, I have evolved on  marriage. I considered, while speaking with the associations that, since it was about mutual consent between two adults, it was not possible to refuse an equality of  rights. Society has evolved a lot, I keep my questions about adoption to myself; it is necessary to find out how to write in the civil code how to organise the filiation of a child who is adopted by a homo- couple.
In reality, the goal had been clearly made known, as early as 1900, by the great pundits of the League (Masonic) of Human Rights, who declared, at the World Fair in Paris:
Our group is a strong supporter of the integral education of the child by the community, it does not recognize the usefulness of the protection of the parents [...] our group is revolutionary socialist, consequently internationalist anti-patriotic. In the family, we see the very beginning of the clan, the province, the nation; in the paterfamilias, the beginning of the chief, the lord, the king. [...] We want the autonomous personality in the harmonic society. There is no need for the succession of intermediaries: family, province, nation, between the individual and the community. The natural family of the individual is humanity [13].
Behind this cry of hatred against the human family, we easily recognise the revolt of the Prince of selfishness: the demon, Lucifer. Locked in the sterility of his pride, which can only bring forth lies, Satan cannot bear the thought of the God-Father, who not only, from all eternity, gives His Divine Life to the eternal Word but who, in addition, wanted to create men to raise them to this divine filiation, by incorporating them into His only Son.
"The enemies against whom we have to fight are not beings of flesh; it is the Principalities and the Powers of Hell, the leaders of the world of darkness, the evil spirits scattered throughout the universe. Take the weapons of God, to be able to withstand the hour of battle [...]. Above all, have faith; it is the shield where the incendiary arrows of the Evil one will be extinguished. [Eph 6]


[1] - Pierre Simon (1925-2008), Life before all things, Paris, Mazarine, 1979, p. 221-222. Quoted by Christian Lagrave in Salt of the Earth 94, p. 103.

[2] - André Bergevin, Permissive Revolution and Sexuality, From Tolerance as an Argument to Transgression as a Process, Pars, F. X. de Gibert, 2003, p. 366-367.

[3] - The formula is Ernest Renan, in the preface to his Contemporary Questions (Paris, Lévy, 1868, III).

[4] - Do you know, my child, what are the most destructive effects of the Revolution? You would never doubt it. In cutting off Louis XVI's head, the Revolution cut off all fathers' heads. There is no family today, there are only individuals (...). By proclaiming equal rights to paternal succession, they killed the family spirit, they created the taxman! But they have prepared the weakness of superiority and the blind force of the mass, the extinction of the arts, the reign of personal interest (...). We are between two systems: to constitute the State by the Family, or to constitute it by personal interest: democracy or aristocracy, discussion or obedience, Catholicism or religious indifference, that is the question in few words. Honoré de Balzac, The Human Comedy, Scenes from Private Life, Memoirs of Two Young Brides (1840) (Complete Works of H. de Balzac, Volume 2, A. Haussiaud, 1855, 45). - Same interpretation of the Revolution by the feminist Élisabeth Badinter (One is the other, Paris, Odile Jacob, 1986, pp. 192-198).

[5] - Jean-Paul Rabaut Saint-Étienne (1743-1793), member of the Committee of public instruction of the Convention, speech to the Convention, December 21, 1792.

[6] - Joseph Lequinio (1755-1812), Prejudices destroyed, chapter XV, Bastards, Paris, Desenne, 1793, p. 160.

[7] - Jean-Jacques-Régis of Cambaceres (1753-1824), speech to the Convention, August 9, 1793.

[8] - Bishop Henri Delassus, The Family Spirit in the House, in the City and in the State, Desclée, Lille, 1910, p. 133-135. - See on this subject: Jean Gasselin, "Mgr Delassus and the family spirit" in Salt of the Earth 81, p. 23-28.

[9] - Quoted by Bishop Henri Delassus, ibid., P. 133.

[10] - Quoted by Paul Abram, The Evolution of Marriage (Paris, E. Sansot, 1908, with preface by Léon Blum), p. 117. See also the other quotations given by Christian Lagrave in Salt of the Earth 94, p. 96-97.

[11] - Quoted by Marie-Andrée Lagroua Weill-Hallé, Dad's Abortion, Paris Fayard, 1971, ch. 1.

[12] - On the rigging of statistics by INED, in France, see Bel and Lagrange, Plot against Life (SPF, 1979), and Jean Legrand's article in Routes 322 (April 1988), with INED response in Routes No. 327. - On the rigging of statistics in the United States, see Dr. Nathanson's confession ("We falsified the number of illegal abortions"), in Present of Saturday, November 23, 1985.

[13] - Lucien Brunswick (member of the Central Committee of the League of Human Rights), speech at the feminist congress organized in Paris during the World Expo of 1900 (5-8 September) with Ferdinand Buisson and René Viviani. (International Congress of the Status and Rights of Women, Paris, 1901, pp. 388-389, quoted by Christian Lagrave in "Feminism versus the Family," Salt of the Earth 94, 94.)

Saturday, 16 November 2019

The Cordyceps Pontificate of Pope Francis

Hilary White


(The current crisis in the Church is becoming more and more apparent even to those previously not exposed to traditional arguments against the errors of modernism. The Amazonian Synod, Pachamama and the scandalous comments of Pope Francis are awakening those who, even in spite of their years in the Novus Ordo, are able to see contradict Church teaching. Logically this is turning people towards Tradition which can only be a good thing. However, this brings its own problems as many are still attached to many of the erroneous teachings of Vatican II and the previous Conciliar Pontiff's. It has been pointed out by many that in some parishes of the SSPX this has resulted in a lowering in polemics in order to take the 'newbies' sensitivities into account. The following article written for the Remnant Newspaper way back in 2015 by Hilary White, makes a number of good points which are well worth reading again and passing on to those new to Tradition. As someone recently commented Conservative Catholics "are there just to make sure the Barque stays below the speed limit while headed over the cliff "  -Editor traditionalcatholicresistance blog- )

Beginning of Hilary White article -

People who know me well know that this whole rabid Traditionalist Catholic polemicist thing is mostly kept confined to my professional life. In real day-to-day life, I’m really an amateur naturalist. No kidding. Check it out on my blog where I write long posts about octopi and whelks.

One of my favourite things is going stomping about the Umbrian countryside in my wellies with a collecting basket to see what sort of things I can bring home to cook or make into booze. This year my elderflower champagne was so good, I’m already collecting more bottles and a bigger bucket for ten gallons next spring. And when the rose hips are ripened, I’m going to see how they do as liqueur.

One of the things I love is wild mushrooms, but, Russian Roulette being forbidden by the Church, I strictly confine my collecting to varieties I can be absolutely sure of. Mushrooms and fungi are among the most interesting objects of the natural world, and fungi are as important as bees to the natural world’s ability to make things grow and feed the rest of usNot actually plants at all, since they don’t photosynthesize like green vascular plants, but take their nourishment straight out of the medium they grow in, and in doing so, help to break down that medium. A fungus growing on a dead log or tree stump is doing some very important nature-work in helping to break down deadwood into soil.


This is done through a vast network of almost invisible tendrils called “mycelium,” that live under the surface and pervade every inch of the soil beneath your feet. The huge majority of fungal life is mycelium that you mostly can’t see, unless you’re turning over last year’s leaf pile in the spring.
From these tendrils of mycelium sprout the fruiting bodies that we know and love as mushrooms. But they start their life as spores…

…that shoot out in ways that sometimes defy imagination. 


Nature’s pretty cool huh? But I guess you’re wondering why I’m going on about mushrooms on the Remnant’s blog.

The other day someone made a comment about Pope Francis, (you knew we were going there, right?)“I recently read about a disastrous Pope who made many bad decisions, the Pope who succeeded him immediately upon his election nullified all the previous Pope’s decisions. I hope this happens again.”

…and the first thing that popped into my head was, “Nope. It won’t work, because of the mycelium.”

The trouble with this idea is that Francis isn’t an anomaly; he’s a predictable result of the Neomodernism that has infested the Church since the close of Vatican II. The commenter’s idea is that he is an isolated and inexplicable outlier, something like a tick that has just dropped onto the Church at random and who can be burned off once discovered by saner heads. If that were the case, if there were any saner heads available, he wouldn’t have been elected pope in the first place.
Pope Francis is not the problem. Neomodernism is the problem. Pope Francis is more like the fruiting body of the cordyceps mycelium that has infested every last corner of the Catholic Church’s ecosystem. In the natural world, in the forest floor the mycelium are pervasive, but because of all the other processes at work in the soil, the various chemical processes, bacteria, insects, temperature, etc., it isn’t possible for them to utterly take over the whole ecosystem of the forest and kill and eat every other growing thing in it. Unfortunately, the Church’s theological ecosystem doesn’t work the same way, though I think this is more or less how most “conservative” Catholics think it does.

In the analogy that, I swear, just popped unbidden suddenly into my weird brain – probably because of too many nature shows as a kid – Pope Francis is the cordyceps fruiting body that is sprouting out of the infested body of the host of the papacy. The spores of Neomodernism have been bursting out of him since his first moment on the loggia. (Remember that bow? Remember how all secularist media ate up that absurd, unCatholic, populist gesture and launched the Humble Francis Show even before he’d blessed the crowd?)

But I repeat that Francis himself isn’t the problem, and if it hadn’t been him – if he’d not made it to the Conclave or had died during Pope Benedict’s reign – they’d simply have gone to the next one on the list. In fact, I’ve been maintaining among friends that the Faith, the real Catholic religion that has barely subsisted while being systematically suppressed throughout the world for the last 50 years, would not have survived another long “conservative” pontificate. As painful as it is, Francis is really just what we need.

The last two popes, bless ‘em, created what I have come to call the “conservative Catholic middle ground,” a safe space where nice, friendly, inoffensive and politicized Catholics can live in peace with the world. By asserting that Vatican II could be embraced by the Church while retaining all the deposit of the Faith intact, the Catholic conservatism tried to square the theological circle. This was an error, but it was a comforting one that a lot of people embraced, implying that we didn’t really have much to worry about, and didn’t really have to do very much. Just keep soldiering on and being reasonable and accommodating, and all this “liberalism” in the Church would just die out like bellbottoms and lovebeads.

But the reality is now, finally, being revealed to have been much, much worse, as Traditionalists have been trying to tell the rest of the Church for fifty years. After the Council, whatever happened in the meetings, the strength the Church had to fight off the Neomodernist mycelium appeared to die, and in the intervening decades, since the problem was not rooted out completely, the deadly theological cordyceps has finally taken over everything.
The determined maintenance of the “nothing to see here” lie by the hierarchy, has come at this stage to consume nearly all the Church’s resources. To the point where our “conservative pro-life” hero bishops like Archbishop Charles Chaput have begun lashing out at anyone who points to the absurdity of inviting the pope to a World Meeting of Families that deliberately includes pro-aborts and sodomite lobbyists.

This is the result of warm, friendly, easygoing “conservatism,” in the papacy, which in reality is a slow, one-way ratchet that can finally end only in apostasy. Can you imagine what another 20 or 30 years of a John Paul II-style pontificate of slow, incremental, invisible infiltration of Neo-Modernist ideology would have done to us? Would there be any Faith in Our Lord left on earth on the Last Day?
Well, that deadly, compromised position is disappearing as fast as an ice floe under a polar bear in a Greenpeace propaganda meme, and more and more people are realising it. And it is thanks to Francis, who is making it rapidly impossible to take that conservative middle ground.

What is going to be left when he’s done? Our mycelium analogy is useful again. What would happen to a forest that got totally eaten and replaced by fungi? There would be no trees, shrubs or flowers, or any other kind of life. There would only be fungi, which would then die for lack of anything left to eat.

But what is the Neomodernism mycelium consuming? Not the Church, which cannot be touched by it. No, it’s eating the last of the Novusordoist “great façade” that came into existence and grew after Vatican II. It’s eating itself.

And more and more people are figuring it out. Our good friend the editor of this publication has many times said that since the start of Francis’s rampage, the Remnant’s readership has burgeoned. I have heard the same thing from many others who are publishing critical pieces on the pope in other venues. We know that the incredible outrages of this pontificate, not only those of Francis himself, but from his friends and chosen subordinates, are separating the Faithful from the nominal Catholics. People are at last being forced to choose a side by the most “divisive” pope in Catholic history.
In venues as far away as the neoconservative bastion of Crisis Magazine, the meek and mild English convert William Oddie wrote the other day that Francis “doesn’t do doctrine,” and came to the rather lame conclusion that if nothing else, at least he’s not going to last forever. As Dr. Oddie pointed out, even the pope’s own official spokesman, the unflappable Fr. Federico Lombardi, has said that he’s about had it with the nonsense and doesn’t have the first notion what’s going on.

We might be at the point in the Church where the only way to save the body is to amputate huge and formerly useful parts of it. Or maybe, simply, those dead branches will fall off by themselves. Certainly the increasingly hostile secular world and aggressive Islam will have a role to play.
But whatever is coming next from the outside world, Francis is doing the Church a service that perhaps no one else could; he is demonstrating that the Vatican II, Novusordoist experiment has been, to put it as mildly as possible, a complete, utter and catastrophic failure because it has produced churchmen like him. This pope, the naked, unabashed, unapologetic Neomodernist, is stamping all over the tired, half-deflated balloon of “reform of the reform,” that desperate last ditch effort by Pope Benedict and his well-meaning followers to save the hopeless contradictions of Catholic neoconservatism.

What will be left when he is done? Soon, (..) there will be only two choices. It is rapidly becoming clear that there will be the Church and the antiChurch, as we were told by the Lord Jesus Christ there would be at the end.

Thursday, 1 August 2019

The Gifts of God by Fr Perez

If you remember the last time I was here, I started a series of sermons on the Gifts of God. Now we’re all very used to hearing about the gifts of God that are the Supernatural Gifts. We always pray for the Supernatural Virtues, we thank God for them and things like that. But I found a nice little reprint of an old book — I didn’t plagiarize the sermon, but it gave me an inspiration to talk about the gifts that God gives us for which we may not have enough appreciation to Him. And these are the more natural gifts proper to our nature or just things that He gives us, and I wanted to mention a few words about those today. Also, my whole thrust is to have us appreciate the things God gives us, so one thing at a time. Sometimes we try to take the shot gun effect and blast everything at once and it doesn’t really work for us that way. We’ve got to take one thing at a time and exercise that until it becomes a habit and then move on to the next thing.

Today I’m talking about the gift of hearing. Once again, like sight that I talked about last time, hearing is a gift that we don’t fully appreciate or don’t even start to appreciate until we begin to lose our hearing or we see someone who is maybe born deaf and we have a sympathetic prayer for them and it starts us thinking about it, but otherwise we wouldn’t. Scientists now say we hear before birth so you can hear things while you’re still inside your mother, like Mozart that she’s playing for you. According to the modern recommendations, Mozart’s good anytime, so why not before you’re born, to start out on a good foot there. So today I want to talk about this gift of hearing.

I want to remind you as I reminded you with the gift of sight, that there’s not just one window of the soul. There are many windows of the soul. For those of you who didn’t hear what I said about sight, people often say, oh, yes, the eyes are the window of the soul. But they don’t understand what they’re saying. Like so many of the modern sayings, it has become removed from its’ true meaning and they make it to mean something else. A lot of people think, well you have such pretty eyes, I can look into your eyes and I can see your soul. Isn’t that wonderful? No, it’s not that kind of window. It’s called the window but it’s actually only a window of the soul because it is through sight (and through hearing now) that the soul sees out to the world. It’s the soul’s window out on the world.

Remember, the soul is the seat of our intellect. In fact, the soul is where everything that makes us us, is. That’s in the soul. Our personalities, our memories, everything – our intellect, our will are all in our souls. And so the soul then collects information about its’ environment through its’ various windows, sight being the first one, as I spoke about, hearing being the one I’m talking about today.

One thing I want to mention is the many uses of hearing, some of them very basic. We use hearing to learn about life and the world in general, to warn us of danger of course. That’s what our car horn is supposed to be for. In California we’re pretty good about that, if somebody’s about to step out in front of your car or change lanes without knowing you’re there we beep the horn. In New York they just get in the car, put their hand on the horn and just keep going until they get to their destination. It’s a slightly different philosophy, but it’s the same idea. Hearing can warn us of danger in that way. Hearing a rattlesnake for example tells us not to go over there.

Learning – learning about anything, learning in school, we use our hearing. But the highest use of hearing to learn would be mostly hearing things about God. Now things have a hierarchy of uses. Hearing things about God is a highly exalted use of hearing but there are so many others. You know, one thing that your soul enjoys is that it exalts with the holy things about God, but it enjoys many, many, other things that come to us through hearing. Let’s just take the sounds of nature. We are quite blessed to be where we are. Every day I go out and it’s like being in the aviary of the zoo. Just this morning there was a mocking bird pleading its’ song. There were the mourning doves cooing, there were the little tweety birds singing and sparrows and bird-like conversations. Beautiful, beautiful songs and the soul appreciates those. Why? Because of the beauty of them and then it makes us say thank you to God for that particular thing, for the gift of the songs of the birds.
 
Other things too; for example, good music. Now I have to emphasize good music because everybody will say it’s subjective. Well it is and it isn’t. The ancient Greeks came up, well before the time of Christ, with a philosophy of what constitutes beauty. What are the elements of beauty? Do you apply it to music as well as to things you can see with your eyes? Remember, this is input to your soul. There are kinds of music that are good for your soul, as other sounds that are good for your soul. And I would start with, of course, you know religious kind of singing is good, but it’s not something that is really always pleasing to listen to. I know I sound like a heretic when I say it, but Gregorian Chant for example. Gregorian Chant is a beautiful kind of music, one of the most for singing, because what are you doing? You are singing a beautiful prayer when you sing Gregorian Chant, right? And some of the Gregorian Chants are nice to listen to. You can be forgiven if you don’t go home, put up your feet and put on a disc of Gregorian Chant because most of it is more to be prayed by those singing it than to be listened to. To listen can kind of go on and on and on for a while and you go okay, let’s have some Mozart please. Now Mozart and Bach and others like that, they fit very well the conditions for beauty and their beautiful works of music enter your soul and they please your soul. Later on, Western music [not Cowboy, y’all] started to fall apart and it reached its’ height in the 16th, 17th Century and then began really to disintegrate. So I can’t say that the introduction of other forms of music were its’ destruction, because when you get as far as the modernist composers (not Modernists the same way that Francis is but in the composer sense) you get to Prokofiev and Scriabin, it’s junk. It’s like the sound track for a nervous breakdown. These things do not please your soul, but the symmetry and harmony of the classical music, the older classical music really touches your soul.

I was looking at one of the restaurant places, where they had a TV on and they had somebody who was talking about (it was Black History Month) the contribution of the continental African music to Western music. Well, as I said, Western music was only ailing because of Prokofiev and Rachmaninoff and such people but the African tones were its death knell. The introduction of the jungle rhythms into Western music were the poison that finished it off and is continuing to kill the rest of us. We’re talking about the rhythms they came up with like rap and rock and that type of music. These are positively disturbing for your souls. Now take note: Protestants got this wrong too – that’s a subheading of “Protestants got it all wrong anyway”. But one dictum goes like this: Well we listen to Christian rock so we can listen to our Christian rock because it’s Christian, it’s rejoice in the Lord and and and.  Okay, my friends, it’s not the words that necessarily make a song bad, it’s the rhythm, you see. And a lot of these come from the interior of Africa where many cultures are still very primitive. When my ancestors were playing on Stradivari violins and writing symphonies, their ancestors were beating on animal skulls with sticks. But it hasn’t changed is the problem. It hasn’t risen above what it was. In Africa it’s still that and an end in itself. It’s all about tribal sensualism which is the rhythm of rap and things. These are sensualized rhythms that enter into your soul by hearing. So you should not say, well this is good rock, this is soft rock. I mean, soft rock?  Or as a geologist would say, no soft rock, but not that one. I would think more like tufa or something like that which is a soft rock. But it’s still these rhythms insinuating themselves into your soul.

One further thing though that I would say on the positive side of hearing that you should all do. These things that please your soul by way of language – take opera for example. Of course, that’s an acquired taste too, but you notice there are not many English operas. Why? Because English is a lousy language for opera. I mean it’s good for a musical but it’s not good for an opera. So which language do they write them in? Mostly Italian, sometimes German because the sounds of Italian are just very pleasing sounds.

You know, you don’t have Chinese opera either. I’m not just bashing my own language you see. I think probably an Asian opera – you can’t have Rigoletto or something in Chinese. It would not please the soul. Every language has its’ own sounds. To that end, whatever language you speak I’m sure you have poetry. Ours is English, right? And it does your soul good to read poetry to yourself out loud, to memorize poetry, even if it’s secular poetry because even a pleasing bit of secular poetry makes you appreciate the gifts of God more. A lot of times when you read to yourself it’s not the same, right? I mean to read in your head, not out loud. When I was writing this, I was thinking, so somebody who is born deaf, never hearing anything, what do they do when they read? When I read anything, a book or something, it’s like the words echo in my head. Maybe I’m nuts. I never asked anybody about this – Father, you’re weird, that doesn’t happen with us!! But I hear the words in my head when I’m reading. But somebody who has never heard a word I wonder how that works.

In any case, for those of us who can hear, we should occasionally take a well-written bit of poetry and just read it for the very pleasure that it gives to our souls. I have an example here of one of my favorites and it’s an epic poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Now you say, oh my goodness! An epic poem, he’s going to read us an epic poem. Epic means, goes on forever – I’m not going to read you the whole epic poem, just the first two stanzas because just good poetry does a lot for your soul. So this is Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s Evangeline. I don’t know who has read Evangeline before but if you haven’t I’m sure it’s online, you can go to Amazon Prime and get it tomorrow or download it right now instantly right here in church on your i-Phone and start reading along with me – is more like the modern trend. But here are the opening lines from Henry Wadsworth Longfellow. Just listen to the sounds. A good poet is like an artist with the sounds and he just makes a combination of images:


This is the forest primeval. The murmuring pines and the hemlocks,
Bearded with moss, and in garments green, indistinct in the twilight,
Stand like Druids of eld, with voices sad and prophetic,
Stand like harpers hoar, with beards that rest on their bosoms.
Loud from its rocky caverns, the deep-voiced neighboring ocean
Speaks, and in accents disconsolate answers the wail of the forest.

You see, that’s just beautiful to speak and to listen to.

So my dear faithful, by way of appreciating this gift of hearing, I want you to notice when you are here, you are hearing the words of the Mass – nothing more beautiful on God’s green earth. When you go out you will hear many things today. I want you to be conscious and to consciously not just thank God for the source of these things – O God, thank you for this bird, thank you for Father, thank you – whatever, but thank God for the gift of the hearing itself. Thank God for giving us that great overlooked gift that we have and that we need, to be much more thankful for.

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.